The Australian cricketers and batsmen in particular are under huge pressure at the moment. With collapses of 10 for 86, 10 for 85 and 8 for 32 in their last three test innings, there’s no denying they have underperformed. Every player would be disappointed with their own results and ultimately they are responsible for their performances. However, should we really be blaming them or is it the Australian cricket system that needs to be scrutinised?

We live in a time where it’s harder than ever to concentrate. In a world with constant distraction it’s hard for people to concentrate on one task for any period of time without being distracted (see if you can read this article until the end without being distracted). This constant distraction paired with the prominence of T20 cricket means batsman have become far less patient and able to concentrate for long periods.

There are far less draws in Test cricket than in the past, with matches constantly moving at a rapid rate. A hunger to score and hit boundaries combined with flat wickets that don’t test the technique or temperament of a batsman mean modern batsman aren’t as good at absorbing periods of high-quality bowling as they used to be. While this fast paced, action packed cricket is great for spectators who want to be entertained, batsman often find it hard to adapt to difficult Test cricket conditions (seam, swing or spin).

It’s been made clear by Steve Smith and the Australian coaching staff that the disappointing results aren’t through a lack of trying. From all reports, the players are working as hard as ever and are desperate to perform well. So what’s causing these regular collapses in the Australian team?

EVERYONE HAS AN OPINION

With the Australian team’s recent poor performances, every pundit has their own opinion on the reason for the struggles. Many, far more qualified to make judgement on the Australian First-class system than I, are blaming a change in culture and the fiddling with a system that wasn’t broken.

The Aussies failures are in contrast to the success that England has just achieved in the 1st Test in India. While the Australian team is clearly at rock bottom at the moment, and England are going well, statistics suggest that in recent history, the Australian system has produced better batters. Of the world’s top batsman since 1980 Australia has produced eight players who averaged over 50 in Test cricket (minimum 20 tests) while Joe Root (currently averages 53.55) is the only Englishman to average over 50 in Test cricket in this time.

These numbers clearly indicate that the Australian system has produced many world class batsman. However, at the moment there seems to be a lack of batters demanding to be picked in a Test side that has lost its last 5 matches. Where there used to players averaging 50+ in Sheffield Shield cricket and still not being picked, now the next batsman in line all average in the low 40s. Former Tasmanian and Australian fast-bowler Brett Geeves is one former player who believes this is a result of changing the system.

POOR PREPARATION

In my opinion, Australian professional cricketers and young players aspiring to be professional cricketers aren’t playing enough cricket. Leading into the first Test of this series against South Africa, the Australian team had played just one First-class match. Some might say that that’s enough preparation, however, something that has been overlooked is that the fixtures were day-night matches with a pink ball. This meant that the Aussie batsman entered the first Test of the series where they faced Steyn, Philander & Rabada with zero red ball match practice since the middle of August, when they played their last Test match against Sri Lanka in completely different conditions.

While the best players in the world are expected to be able to adapt easily between formats, there’s no denying that changing from white ball to pink ball to red ball and the changing of mindsets and game plans that comes with changing formats, does have an impact on a player. Especially batsmen.

AUSTRALIAN VS ENGLISH SYSTEM

Having played a reasonable level of cricket over a number of years in both Australia and England I believe there is one thing that is far better about the English system than the Australian…the amount of cricket that is played. Whether it’s First-class, 2nd XI or mid-week social matches, there are far more matches played in England than there are in Australia.

In county cricket, there are sixteen county championship matches a season and sides often play one or two First-class matches against a university or touring side on top of this. In Australia, there are only ten First-class matches per state per season plus a final for the top 2 sides.

During my time at Middlesex, where I predominantly played 2nd XI, we would play a one day match (40 overs a side) and a three-day match (90 overs a day) against another county almost every week of the summer. The batters and spinners would also play league cricket every weekend. In between this we might have a training session and a day or two off.

Comparing the standard of competitions between countries is always hard but there’s no doubt (in my mind) that grade cricket in Australia is far superior to league cricket in UK. Last weekend I played a 1st grade match that featured a number of current and former First-class players. In the match Fremantle CC had Sam Whiteman (WA), Ashton Turner (WA), Jake Carder (WA), Tom Abell (Somerset), Chris Wood (Ex WA) & Jamie Heath (Ex NSW), while we (Melville CC) had Ryan Duffield (WA), Angus Robson (Leicestershire), Fraser Hay (Hampshire), Mark Turner (WA 2nd XI), Drew Porter (Ex WA), Luke Towers (Ex WA), & myself (Ex Middlesex).

When assessing the careers of Turner (23 years old) and Robson (24 years old), two very good young batsman, the discrepancy in the matches played in the English system compared to Australia is glaring. Turner made his First-class debut in July 2013, 6 weeks before Robson made his First-class debut. Since then Turner has played 15 First-class matches while Robson has gone on to play 53. While Turner has been a permanent part of the WA white ball sides in this time, he has been unable to nail down a spot in the WA Sheffield Shield side given its strong and established batters. That being said, even if he had been in the team for every First-class match from the time he made his debut, he would have played 34 matches (including 2 shield finals).This is 19 less 4-day matches than Robson has played in the same period. That’s potentially 38 less First-class innings and 76 less days of high-quality cricket available to a young Australian batsman compared to a young English batsman.

Angus Robson batting for Leicestershire (Photo: Ed Melia)

With the amount of cricket that is played in the UK, players do burn out and at times play at a lower intensity. While this is a downside of playing more cricket, the positive is that batsman are always batting. They learn about their games and how to problem solve and adapt to different conditions through actually playing. In Australia, with all the non-playing time in between matches, batsman have to learn their game as much in the nets or during centre-wicket practice where there is far less pressure, as in a match.

BATTERS NEED TO BAT

As a batsman, the best way to improve is to play and be challenged by and learn from different experiences and conditions. During the second Test in Hobart, when asked whether Joe Burns should play for Queensland in the upcoming Sheffield Shield match in between Tests, Chris Rogers replied “Definitely. There’s no substitute for time in the middle.” While Burns will be a bit fatigued, more mentally than physically from the pressures of a Test match, he’s not going to get back in form by hitting throw downs or facing a bowling machine. He needs to bat in a match and get his game and confidence back in order.

During my time in the county system, I would usually bat (in a match) 4 times a week.  While most 1st XI players rarely play league cricket, all young batters who were playing in the second team would play for their club side every week. It was another chance to have a hit and learn your game. There is no coincidence that this was a time in my career when I played at my best…..When you’re in form you can have an epic purple patch that lasts for weeks. It’s like one long innings where you can literally bat for days and days. On the flip side, when you’re out of form it’s mentally difficult to keep getting up for the next match. That being said, I never had to wait more than a few days for another hit and my next opportunity to turn my form around.

In contrast, in the Australian system it can be weeks or even a month between innings. Sometimes if you miss out in your only innings for 3 weekends it could be well over a month until you get another chance to have a hit and spend time in the middle. Even if you’re coming off runs in your last match it’s hard to ever feel in form when you haven’t batted in a match in weeks.

NOT ENOUGH CRICKET

On top of this, the current Australian second XI competition, the Futures League, only has six four-day matches for each state this season. While there are other issues with Australia’s First-class feeder competition which are well summarised by Geeves, this simply isn’t enough cricket.

In a summer that has 26 weeks from the start of October to the end of March, young wannabe First-class players are only playing for 6 weeks during this time. What are they doing for the other 108 days of the summer when they aren’t playing? This competition, along with grade cricket is the breeding ground for First-class cricketers which in turn produces the Australian players. How are players expected to improve if they aren’t playing?

I wonder what the young WA batters like Josh Inglis, Will Bosisto & Jake Carder are doing this week? I’m sure that they will be training hard; hitting lots of balls and doing their fitness work but there’s no doubt that they would learn more and be better players by playing against fringe players from other states every week.

Justin Langer and the WACA coaching staff always encourage/ make the WACA players play grade cricket whenever possible. For this they should be commended as this is not something that is always enforced by state coaches. Langer has often mentioned the high regard he holds for grade cricket. However, I cannot understand why the state’s best young batterss, who should be playing as much as possible, are forced to miss grade matches to fly to a 2nd XI match on a Saturday….two days before the match begins on a Monday (bowlers are different and should fly two days before they play). These young batters are missing vital opportunities to bat, be put under pressure and learn their games. It could be three weeks until they get their next hit in grade cricket.

AN INVESTMENT INTO AUSTRALIAN CRICKET

I understand the logistics are more complicated in Australia than in the UK. Instead of driving a few hours up the M1 or M4 to play another county, Australian professional teams have to fly interstate which not only takes more time and energy but also costs more money. However, I think it’s time this whole competition was seriously looked at. I think regular 2nd XI cricket would be an investment into the future of Australian cricket. After all, if Australia isn’t performing well in world cricket then there will be less punters going to watch and there will also be less young boys and girls wanting to play the game.

Batting is a game that’s played between the ears. While a sound technique and constant maintenance is necessary, it’s a player’s mindset and temperament that determines whether or not they are going to cut it at the highest level. No matter what lengths a coach goes to, no practice session can ever replicate the pressures of a match. It is clear to see in the current Australian team that the batsman are struggling due to the lack of cricket as much as their own technical or mental deficiencies.

It seems that Cricket Australia has realised that the batsman need time in the middle, not the nets as they have made them play in the Sheffield Shield match between tests. They (Cricket Australia), the Australian Cricketers Association and the Australian players need to be commended for their efforts to improve Australian cricket by giving back to grassroots and grade cricket. But if they are serious about becoming the best in the world again then they need to get serious about other aspects of the system.

They need to create a system where players can play as often as possible and be put under pressure in different conditions and circumstances. Young batters shouldn’t be training for a couple hours then having the rest of the day away from cricket week after week. They should be playing tough, competitive matches where they are challenged technically and mentally as often as possible.

To get better and handle tough situations on the international stage, batters need to bat, at all levels. So it’s time for the administrators to give them that opportunity.

If you enjoy our thoughts and insight into the game then please Subscribe to get our articles straight to your inbox.

About the author : Tom Scollay

3 Comments

  1. Pup November 17, 2016 at 7:11 am - Reply

    Spot on Tom! Great article!

    How about Cricket Australia asking the curators to prepare some decks at state level which are green seaming decks? We look uncomfortable at best on seaming pitches. It looks as though our players are playing the ball far too early as we are used to playing on roads. Perhaps with some seaming pitches at feeder and state level it might help players to play the ball a little later and therefore account for some of the deviation. When you look at the English batsmen they tend to do this really well.

    Just a thought..

  2. David Lees November 17, 2016 at 9:42 am - Reply

    Replacing the Kookaburra with the Tiflex ball in WA will have a positive effect, a lot of the current problems stem from poor footwork. A good article which nails Englands recent success – Root decent footwork played recreational cricket against the Tiflex Oxbridge Windsor, watch his head move towards the ball, head always over the ball, doesn’t rely on a big bat either.

  3. […] I read the article Let the batters bat, it immediately got me thinking about the benefits of playing cricket abroad as a young aspiring […]

Leave A Comment

Subscribe to newsletter

Insider offers & flash sales in your inbox every week.

Latest videos

Join our mailing list today

Insider offers & flash sales in your inbox every week.

[one_full last="yes" spacing="yes" center_content="no" hide_on_mobile="no" background_color="" background_image="" background_repeat="no-repeat" background_position="left top" hover_type="none" link="" border_position="all" border_size="0px" border_color="" border_style="solid" padding="" margin_top="" margin_bottom="0px" animation_type="0" animation_direction="down" animation_speed="0.1" animation_offset="" class="" id=""][imageframe lightbox="no" gallery_id="" lightbox_image="" style_type="none" hover_type="none" bordercolor="" bordersize="0px" borderradius="0" stylecolor="" align="none" link="" linktarget="_self" animation_type="0" animation_direction="down" animation_speed="0.1" animation_offset="" hide_on_mobile="no" class="" id=""] [/imageframe]

Chris 'Bucky' Rogers batting for Somerset in one of his 554 First-class innings

[/one_full]

I once spoke to a former professional player who became a coach in the professional ranks and asked him whether he would change his technique during the season during his playing career. He responded in the negative.

[one_third last="no" spacing="yes" center_content="no" hide_on_mobile="no" background_color="" background_image="" background_repeat="no-repeat" background_position="left top" hover_type="none" link="" border_position="all" border_size="0px" border_color="" border_style="solid" padding="" margin_top="30" margin_bottom="" animation_type="0" animation_direction="down" animation_speed="0.1" animation_offset="" class="" id=""][imageframe lightbox="no" gallery_id="" lightbox_image="" style_type="none" hover_type="none" bordercolor="" bordersize="0px" borderradius="0" stylecolor="" align="none" link="" linktarget="_self" animation_type="0" animation_direction="down" animation_speed="0.1" animation_offset="" hide_on_mobile="no" class="" id=""] [/imageframe][/one_third][two_third last="yes" spacing="yes" center_content="no" hide_on_mobile="no" background_color="" background_image="" background_repeat="no-repeat" background_position="left top" hover_type="none" link="" border_position="all" border_size="0px" border_color="" border_style="solid" padding="" margin_top="30" margin_bottom="" animation_type="0" animation_direction="down" animation_speed="0.1" animation_offset="" class="" id=""]

About the writer: Chris 'Bucky' Rogers isn't your typical cricketer. Having toiled away in First-class cricket for over 15 years, he was finally rewarded for years of dominance opening the batting in both Australia & England with selection in the Australian Test team for the 2013 Ashes in England. He went on to play 25 Test matches for Australia where he scored 2,015 runs @ 42.87 including 5 x 100s. With the amazing First-class record of 25,470 runs & 76 centuries, he has now retired from playing and transitioned into coaching, where he currently is the batting coach for Somerset CCC. 

[/two_third]

He said working on technique is for preseason and once he started playing, all that mattered was watching the ball.

That, I’ve discovered, is a very traditional response, handed down from father to son.

I had to stop myself from groaning out loud. “How short-sighted” I wanted to reply. I’m sure he’s not alone and these days, coaches are reluctant to challenge technical issues in young players, preferring the students to figure it out themselves. Perhaps they fear intervention will only create more problems.

NO PRE-SEASON?

What if a player never has a pre-season as, like me, he plays continuously on both sides of the world, where the seasons overlap?

Just once did I have a pre-season in Australia – and that I remember mostly for the agony of running the sand-hills at City Beach in Perth, rather than any working on technique.

Instead I was chasing an endless summer by playing 12 months of the year in England as well as home. “What is a pre-season?” was my standard jibe at teammates.

That meant technical experimentation had to be done on the job – so the standard answer to not work on your game for six months of the year seems like a waste of time and opportunity to me.

Often as a young batsman, you’ll have days when you pick up a bat and it feels like it is a natural extension of your body and other days when it feels like you’re hefting around a railway sleeper.

DAYS WHEN THINGS WEREN'T WORKING

Numerous days in grade cricket and even opening the batting for Western Australia, my swing would feel so awkward I would be trying to adjust almost every ball. I might try picking the bat up higher in my swing, other times move my hands forward in my stance and even change the width of my stance. These were just a very few of many.

In fact what would really confuse me is, somehow I’d last until the lunch break feeling like I couldn’t hit one off the square and then come out after a 40 minute sit down and feel like I was Brian Lara … well not quite but you get the drift.

What it taught me though was to keep trying to get better. I would often think to myself, and now sprout this to every kid possible, one step back to go two steps forward. Working with my dad who was my coach, I’d try all sorts of technical changes and usually, after a while, something would click and it would all fall into place. It would be like hitting at a brick wall and then all of a sudden one thing works and the rest fall over like dominoes.

PROBLEM SOLVING - DON'T GET OUT THE SAME WAY

One of the great advantages of playing in four innings matches is the chance to problem solve as a batsman between the first and second innings. I disliked … no, I hated getting out the same way or to the same bowler in the second innings as I did in the first.

After getting out I would sit down and figure out a way to combat the bowler who dismissed me first time around. It might not have just been a mental change but quite possibly a technical one.

Stuart Clark once dismissed me for a duck with a perfect ball that pitched on off stump line and nipped away but instead of just accepting he’d bowled me a jaffa, I checked out the footage and saw my hands were not coming down straight in my swing pattern and caused everything - my hands and bat - to go towards mid on. So my bat actually was inside the line, hence the ball found my outside edge.

Second innings, my focus was trying to get my hands to go towards mid-off while playing with the inside half of my bat to counter the away movement. Yes I know this is a bit more than ‘Batting 101’ but I only started to understand my own batting by constantly tinkering – even to the extent of working out what doesn’t work, to find out what does.

PLAYING TO COACHING

As I moved from player to become a coach, a surprise first-up piece of advice from other coaches was to be careful about the level of input you try to pass on. Yes, that makes sense and it would be ignorant to not listen to advice from people who have spent a long time coaching. However, it will need to be balanced against my long-held belief that the best players in the world never stop seeking improvement.

My first club-coaching role came via former Australian player and teammate Bob Quiney to help out at his beloved St Kilda Cricket Club, where the players have an average age younger than ever and a thirst for learning.

I was wary of saying too much early, but when one player said, “I’ll do whatever you tell me to do Buck”, my tinkering instincts took over.

“One step back to go two steps forward”, I reasoned.

The first player asked me how to play slow medium pace bowlers as he had nicked off to one the previous Saturday. I told him to be positive and proactive. Walk at the bowler or walk into his line … a la Steve Smith … and whip him through the leg side if the bowler went for the stumps. The next Saturday he was in the same position and ended up, he said, with too much going through his mind and being neither proactive nor defensive. He nicked off again. But he had learnt from his mistake and knew what he’d do the next time and since has had some success.

[imageframe lightbox="no" gallery_id="" lightbox_image="" style_type="none" hover_type="none" bordercolor="" bordersize="0px" borderradius="0" stylecolor="" align="none" link="" linktarget="_self" animation_type="0" animation_direction="down" animation_speed="0.1" animation_offset="" hide_on_mobile="no" class="" id=""] [/imageframe]

 Bucky passing on some knowledge during a batting masterclass for Cricket Mentoring in Perth

[separator style_type="none" top_margin="" bottom_margin="" sep_color="" border_size="" icon="" icon_circle="" icon_circle_color="" width="" alignment="" class="" id=""]

INDOOR NETS SYNDROME

Another had what I call ‘indoor nets syndrome’ and had developed a swing where he just jabbed at balls that would race off his bat on the true synthetic surface, but had difficulty with the natural variation of turf wickets. His hands would go towards the leg side in his swing but the ball would slice to cover or more likely the slips. I was wary of trying to reshape his whole swing but then thought “Why not?” I’ll show him what I think works and he can figure the end result out for himself”. He was quite difficult to adjust and we even experimented with grip changes, not something I’d usually recommend.

After an hour’s work he was starting to get the basic principles and enjoying it. He had a far better understanding of a swing after trying something new and that can only benefit him. He can always go back to what he was doing but at least he’d tinkered and thought about it. Afterwards he seemed genuinely excited at the change and the understanding.

Yet there have been plenty of times where my coaching hasn’t worked. I tried to help Peter Siddle with his batting but made it worse. Eventually he figured a few things out himself and is still getting better – so maybe my “one-step-backwards” theory helped!

CHANGE TAKES TIME

With most things, change takes time to feel natural and this principle needs to be stressed and I’m wary of trying to change players into playing like me but sometimes certain things need to be tried.  I’m amazed when I see any tall player stand with his feet close together in his stance when Kevin Pietersen is ‘Example A’ of how to succeed as a tall batsman.

I firmly believe all the best players in the world are tinkerers and never stop trying to improve. Just ask Marcus Trescothick, who at age 41 was still telling everyone how he’s trying to fix things. That and his saying that ‘form hides in mysterious places’ were my two favourite things I got from him.

At the moment the county season has just started and he’s still working on his game plan against different kind of bowling. You’d think he’d have it all sorted by now but no, he’s using every opportunity to improve as we all should.

SUCCEEDING AT THE AGE OF 38

When asking me to write this article, Scolls (Tom Scollay) asked that I write a little about my own journey and how I managed to play well in the 2015 Ashes at age 38.

Like Trescothick, I had a thirst for perfection. Grit and determination was only a part of it. So many years of 12-months-playing of four-day cricket meant I had a very good understanding of my own game, with all its strengths and weaknesses, and to have some success against James Anderson, Stuart Broad, Mark Wood and Steve Finn in bowler-friendly conditions was only possible with an in depth, intimate knowledge of my swing and my game.

For different bowlers and conditions, I would have different triggers. On the wickets that provided more bounce and seam I would have a back and across trigger while at other times, particularly against Anderson’s swing, I would push forward to try and cover the movement.

This skill only comes from trial and error and experimentation and willingness to learn. If every time I tried something, had initial failure and not persevered, my game would have been very one dimensional and limited.

Growing up I often watched in awe some of the bigger kids who seemed to make batting look easy but then fell away when they had to play against adults who matched them in size and strength. I believe it was because these kids had got it so easy early on, that they hadn’t learned to work at their game to try to understand it better.

ALL THE BEST ARE ALWAYS CHASING IMPROVEMENT

Of course, there are plenty of examples to disprove the mould but of all the best batsmen I have seen, the one consistent attribute they possess is a desire to never be satisfied and to chase improvement.

They tinker to learn … and then comes improvement.

[separator style_type="none" top_margin="" bottom_margin="" sep_color="" border_size="" icon="" icon_circle="" icon_circle_color="" width="" alignment="" class="" id=""][one_full last="yes" spacing="yes" center_content="no" hide_on_mobile="no" background_color="" background_image="" background_repeat="no-repeat" background_position="left top" hover_type="none" link="" border_position="all" border_size="0px" border_color="" border_style="solid" padding="" margin_top="30" margin_bottom="" animation_type="0" animation_direction="down" animation_speed="0.1" animation_offset="" class="" id=""]

If you enjoy our thoughts and insight into the game then please Subscribe to get our articles straight to your email (keep an eye on your junk mail as they sometimes end up in there).

[/one_full]

Curabitur non nulla sit amet nisl tempus convallis quis ac lectus dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit sed porttitor lectus.